Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Smith v. Reilly, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes two appeals by Harold Smith, a federal prisoner, of a district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his detention and denial of his motion for reconsideration. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed both district court rulings, finding no reversible error in the record. The appeals were submitted without oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Smith v. Reilly, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views3 pages
    This document summarizes two appeals by Harold Smith, a federal prisoner, of a district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his detention and denial of his motion for reconsideration. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed both district court rulings, finding no reversible error in the record. The appeals were submitted without oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-11-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-6225

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes two appeals by Harold Smith, a federal prisoner, of a district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his detention and denial of his motion for reconsideration. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed both district court rulings, finding no reversible error in the record. The appeals were submitted without oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views3 pages

    Smith v. Reilly, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes two appeals by Harold Smith, a federal prisoner, of a district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his detention and denial of his motion for reconsideration. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed both district court rulings, finding no reversible error in the record. The appeals were submitted without oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-6225

    HAROLD SMITH,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    EDWARD F. REILLY, JR.; SANDRA HILTON; JEFFREY
    S.
    KOSTBAR;
    CHARLES
    LYONS;
    ALBERTO
    R.
    GONZALES; HARLEY G. LAPPIN; RICHARD HOLT; JOHN
    J. LAMANNA,

    Defendants - Appellees.

    No. 06-6315

    HAROLD SMITH,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    EDWARD F. REILLY, JR.; SANDRA HILTON; JEFFREY
    S.
    KOSTBAR;
    CHARLES
    LYONS;
    ALBERTO
    R.
    GONZALES; HARLEY G. LAPPIN; RICHARD HOLT; JOHN
    J. LAMANNA,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
    (6:05-cv-03426-HFF)

    Submitted: October 31, 2006

    Decided:

    November 3, 2006

    Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Harold Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    - 2 -

    PER CURIAM:
    Harold Smith, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
    courts orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge
    and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (2000) petition and
    denying Smiths motion for reconsideration.
    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    Smith v. Reilly, No.

    6:05-cv-03426-HFF (D.S.C. Jan. 9, 2006 & Feb. 1, 2006).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 3 -

    You might also like