Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Frye, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    1) James Preston Frye appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's denial. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-04-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-6730

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) James Preston Frye appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's denial. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Frye, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) James Preston Frye appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's denial. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-6730

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    JAMES PRESTON FRYE, a/k/a Jamie Frye,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, Chief
    District Judge. (3:01-cr-00167-JRS-1)

    Submitted:

    March 25, 2009

    Decided:

    April 3, 2009

    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    James Preston Frye, Appellant Pro Se.


    Brian Ronald Hood,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    James Preston Frye appeals the district courts order
    denying

    his

    motion

    3582(c)(2) (2000).
    reversible error.

    for

    sentence

    reduction

    under

    18

    U.S.C.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    United States v. Frye, No. 3:01-cr-

    00167-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 23, 2008).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like