Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    United States v. Gerald Felton, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Gerald Felton appealed the district court's denial of his motion under Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court did not require oral arguments because the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials. The appeals court upheld the district court's decision to deny Felton's motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Gerald Felton, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Gerald Felton appealed the district court's denial of his motion under Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court did not require oral arguments because the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials. The appeals court upheld the district court's decision to deny Felton's motion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-11-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-6759

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Gerald Felton appealed the district court's denial of his motion under Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court did not require oral arguments because the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials. The appeals court upheld the district court's decision to deny Felton's motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Gerald Felton, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Gerald Felton appealed the district court's denial of his motion under Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court did not require oral arguments because the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials. The appeals court upheld the district court's decision to deny Felton's motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-6759

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    GERALD FELTON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    James C. Fox, Senior
    District Judge. (5:93-cr-00123-F-1)

    Submitted:

    October 18, 2011

    Decided:

    November 9, 2011

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Gerald Felton, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Gerald

    Felton

    appeals

    the

    district

    denying his motion under Fed. R. Crim. P. 36.


    the record and find no reversible error.

    courts

    order

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v.

    Felton,

    23,

    2011).

    facts

    and

    dispense

    No.

    5:93-cr-00123-F-1

    with

    oral

    argument

    (E.D.N.C.
    because

    May
    the

    We
    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like