Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Bunch v. Bray, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to the defendants in a civil action brought by Sheltina Bunch and William Bunch. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court decision dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-11-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-2007

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to the defendants in a civil action brought by Sheltina Bunch and William Bunch. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court decision dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Bunch v. Bray, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to the defendants in a civil action brought by Sheltina Bunch and William Bunch. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court decision dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-2007

    SHELTINA BUNCH; WILLIAM BUNCH,


    Plaintiffs - Appellants,
    versus
    KEVIN BRAY; JAMES HENNING; CITY OF ELIZABETH
    CITY, NORTH CAROLINA; HERMAN L. BUNCH,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Malcolm J. Howard,
    District Judge. (CA-95-30-2-H)
    Submitted:

    October 29, 1996

    Decided:

    November 7, 1996

    Before MURNAGHAN, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Sheltina Bunch, William Bunch, Appellants Pro Se. Donald Carpenter
    Prentiss, John David Leidy, HORHNTAL, RILEY, ELLIS & MALAND, Elizabeth City, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellants appeal from the district court's order granting
    Defendants' motion for summary judgment in their civil action. We
    have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find
    no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. Bunch v. Bray, No. CA-95-30-2-H (E.D.N.C. June 20,
    1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like