Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    United States v. Cepeda, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished per curiam opinion dismissing Fausto Cepeda's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Cepeda, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished per curiam opinion dismissing Fausto Cepeda's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-02-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7789

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished per curiam opinion dismissing Fausto Cepeda's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    United States v. Cepeda, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished per curiam opinion dismissing Fausto Cepeda's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7789

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    FAUSTO CEPEDA,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
    (CR-93-128, CA-98-337)

    Submitted:

    February 11, 1998

    Decided:

    February 25, 1999

    Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Fausto Cepeda, Appellant Pro Se. David T. Maguire, Assistant United
    States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Fausto Cepeda seeks to appeal the district courts order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.
    1998).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opin-

    ion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

    icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of


    the district court.

    See United States v. Cepeda, Nos. CR-93-128;

    CA-98-337 (E.D. Va. Nov. 24, 1998). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like