Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Skippy Incorporated v. Lipton Investments, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    22 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Skippy Incorporated's complaint against Lipton Investments for failure to state a claim. The district court dismissed the complaint for multiple reasons, including failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record thoroughly and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the case.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-09-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-1086

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Skippy Incorporated's complaint against Lipton Investments for failure to state a claim. The district court dismissed the complaint for multiple reasons, including failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record thoroughly and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    22 views2 pages

    Skippy Incorporated v. Lipton Investments, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Skippy Incorporated's complaint against Lipton Investments for failure to state a claim. The district court dismissed the complaint for multiple reasons, including failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record thoroughly and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-1086

    SKIPPY INCORPORATED,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    LIPTON INVESTMENTS, INCORPORATED,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-02-1227-A)

    Submitted:

    August 29, 2003

    Decided:

    September 12, 2003

    Before WILKINSON, WIDENER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Mary Helen Sears, M. H. SEARS LAW FIRM, Washington, D.C., for


    Appellant. William M. Webner, SUGHRUE MION, P.L.L.C., Washington,
    D.C., for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Skippy

    Incorporated

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing its complaint, among other reasons, for failure to state


    a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
    P. 12(b)(6).

    We have thoroughly reviewed the record and find no

    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court.

    See Skippy Inc. v. Lipton Investments, Inc.,

    No. CA-02-1227-A (E.D. Va. Dec. 20, 2002).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like