Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Wright v. State of NC, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Jeffrey Wright appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the State of North Carolina and Rick Jackson. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. In an unpublished opinion, the appeals court stated that it had reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasoning for denying Wright's complaint as outlined in its March 2, 2006 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-06-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-6439

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Jeffrey Wright appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the State of North Carolina and Rick Jackson. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. In an unpublished opinion, the appeals court stated that it had reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasoning for denying Wright's complaint as outlined in its March 2, 2006 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Wright v. State of NC, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Jeffrey Wright appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the State of North Carolina and Rick Jackson. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. In an unpublished opinion, the appeals court stated that it had reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasoning for denying Wright's complaint as outlined in its March 2, 2006 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-6439

    JEFFREY L. WRIGHT,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; RICK JACKSON,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior
    District Judge. (3:06-cv-00082)

    Submitted: May 18, 2006

    Decided: June 1, 2006

    Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jeffrey L. Wright, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Jeffrey L. Wright appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Wright v.

    North Carolina, No. 3:06-cv-00082 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 2, 2006).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like