Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    Vaughn v. Adams, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of Donta Vaughn's motion for a temporary restraining order against the warden and federal correctional complex where he was incarcerated. The district court had construed Vaughn's motion as a Bivens complaint. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Vaughn v. Adams, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of Donta Vaughn's motion for a temporary restraining order against the warden and federal correctional complex where he was incarcerated. The district court had construed Vaughn's motion as a Bivens complaint. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-06-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-6409

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of Donta Vaughn's motion for a temporary restraining order against the warden and federal correctional complex where he was incarcerated. The district court had construed Vaughn's motion as a Bivens complaint. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Vaughn v. Adams, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of Donta Vaughn's motion for a temporary restraining order against the warden and federal correctional complex where he was incarcerated. The district court had construed Vaughn's motion as a Bivens complaint. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-6409

    DONTA VAUGHN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    VANESSA P. ADAMS, Warden; FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL
    COMPLEX, PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    T. S. Ellis, III, Senior
    District Judge. (1:07-cv-00167-TSE)

    Submitted: June 15, 2007

    Decided:

    June 22, 2007

    Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Donta Vaughn, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Donta Vaughn appeals the district courts order denying
    his motion for a temporary restraining order, which the district
    court construed as a complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six
    Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388
    (1971).

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Vaughn v. Adams, No. 1:07-cv-00167-TSE (E.D. Va. Mar. 6,

    2007).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like