Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    Sandra Robinson v. Nielsen TV Ratings, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Sandra Robinson's appeal of a district court order denying her discovery motions. The appeals court found that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the appeal because the district court's order was not a final judgment and did not fall into the limited categories of appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Therefore, the appeals court dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Sandra Robinson v. Nielsen TV Ratings, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Sandra Robinson's appeal of a district court order denying her discovery motions. The appeals court found that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the appeal because the district court's order was not a final judgment and did not fall into the limited categories of appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Therefore, the appeals court dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-03-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-2252

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Sandra Robinson's appeal of a district court order denying her discovery motions. The appeals court found that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the appeal because the district court's order was not a final judgment and did not fall into the limited categories of appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Therefore, the appeals court dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Sandra Robinson v. Nielsen TV Ratings, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Sandra Robinson's appeal of a district court order denying her discovery motions. The appeals court found that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the appeal because the district court's order was not a final judgment and did not fall into the limited categories of appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Therefore, the appeals court dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-2252

    SANDRA ROBINSON,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    NIELSEN TV RATINGS,
    Defendant Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, Chief
    District Judge. (3:10-cv-00009-JRS)

    Submitted:

    February 28, 2012

    Decided:

    March 7, 2012

    Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Sandra Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.


    John M. Barr, Crystal L.
    Norrick, JACKSON LEWIS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Sandra Robinson seeks to appeal the district courts
    November 8, 2011 order, denying her discovery motions.
    court

    may

    exercise

    jurisdiction

    only

    over

    final

    This

    orders,

    28

    U.S.C. 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral


    orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
    Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).

    The

    order Robinson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an


    appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
    dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    Accordingly, we
    We dispense with
    contentions
    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    DISMISSED

    You might also like