Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    Michael Lynn Brown v. Virginia Parole Board, 89 F.3d 827, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from June 6, 1996. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief for the appellant's Section 1983 complaint against the Virginia Parole Board. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The court also denied the appellant's motion to transport him to the court to inspect the record, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Michael Lynn Brown v. Virginia Parole Board, 89 F.3d 827, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views1 page
    The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from June 6, 1996. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief for the appellant's Section 1983 complaint against the Virginia Parole Board. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The court also denied the appellant's motion to transport him to the court to inspect the record, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-06-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 89 F.3d 827 Docket: 96-6268

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from June 6, 1996. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief for the appellant's Section 1983 complaint against the Virginia Parole Board. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The court also denied the appellant's motion to transport him to the court to inspect the record, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views1 page

    Michael Lynn Brown v. Virginia Parole Board, 89 F.3d 827, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from June 6, 1996. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief for the appellant's Section 1983 complaint against the Virginia Parole Board. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The court also denied the appellant's motion to transport him to the court to inspect the record, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    89 F.

    3d 827

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Michael Lynn BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 96-6268.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted May 16, 1996.
    Decided June 6, 1996.

    Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
    of the district court. Brown v. VA Parole Board, No. CA-96-146-R (W.D.Va.
    Feb. 14, 1996). Additionally, we deny Brown's motion to transport him to this
    court to allow him to inspect the record. We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like