Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Saitta v. MD Department Health, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Francis Saitta appealed a district court ruling that denied relief on his civil complaint alleging violations of his due process rights against the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible errors, affirming the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-12-13 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-1842

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Francis Saitta appealed a district court ruling that denied relief on his civil complaint alleging violations of his due process rights against the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible errors, affirming the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Saitta v. MD Department Health, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Francis Saitta appealed a district court ruling that denied relief on his civil complaint alleging violations of his due process rights against the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible errors, affirming the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-1842

    FRANCIS P. SAITTA,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MARYLAND
    HYGIENE,

    DEPARTMENT

    OF

    HEALTH

    AND

    MENTAL
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA05-832-JFM)

    Submitted:

    November 21, 2005

    Decided:

    December 13, 2005

    Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Francis P. Saitta, Appellant Pro Se.


    Timothy James Paulus,
    Assistant Attorney General, David Rowland Morgan, Assistant
    Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Francis P. Saitta appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his civil complaint, in which he alleged that his
    due process rights were violated.
    find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court.

    See Saitta v. Md. Dept of Health &

    Mental Hygiene, No. CA-05-832-JFM (D. Md. July 19, 2005).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like