Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 10 views

    Fuell v. United States, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Kevin Jerome Fuell's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Fuell's petition. The court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to allow for a decision. The court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Fuell's petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Fuell v. United States, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Kevin Jerome Fuell's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Fuell's petition. The court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to allow for a decision. The court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Fuell's petition.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-09-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-7165

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Kevin Jerome Fuell's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Fuell's petition. The court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to allow for a decision. The court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Fuell's petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views2 pages

    Fuell v. United States, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Kevin Jerome Fuell's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Fuell's petition. The court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to allow for a decision. The court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Fuell's petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-7165

    KEVIN JEROME FUELL,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,
    District Judge. (1:04-cv-00019-FPS)

    Submitted: August 31, 2006

    Decided: September 8, 2006

    Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Kevin Jerome Fuell, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Kevin Jerome Fuell, a federal prisoner, appeals the
    district

    courts

    order

    accepting

    the

    recommendation

    of

    the

    magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (2000)


    petition.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    See Fuell v. United States, No. 1:04-cv-00019-FPS

    (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 29, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like