Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Harmon, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Michael Anthony Harmon, Jr.'s motion for review of his sentence. Harmon appealed the district court's ruling pro se. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. It affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons provided in its ruling. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-10-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-6791

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Michael Anthony Harmon, Jr.'s motion for review of his sentence. Harmon appealed the district court's ruling pro se. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. It affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons provided in its ruling. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Harmon, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Michael Anthony Harmon, Jr.'s motion for review of his sentence. Harmon appealed the district court's ruling pro se. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. It affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons provided in its ruling. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-6791

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    MICHAEL ANTHONY HARMON, JR.,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Aiken. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge.
    (1:00-cr-00153-CMC-1)

    Submitted:

    October 11, 2007

    Decided:

    October 17, 2007

    Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael Anthony Harmon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Dean Arthur


    Eichelberger, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael Anthony Harmon, Jr., appeals the district courts
    order denying his motion nunc pro tunc for review of sentence.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    United States v. Harmon, No. 1:00-cr-00153-CMC-1 (D.S.C.

    May 17, 2007).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like