Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Chhaparwal v. West Virginia College of Medicine, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views3 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment in favor of the defendants in a case brought by Dhiraj Chhaparwal. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. Chhaparwal had filed a complaint against West Virginia College of Medicine and Health Sciences Center and other parties, which the district court dismissed by granting the defendants' motion for summary judgment. The appellate court denied Chhaparwal's motion for transcripts at government expense.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-06-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-2165

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment in favor of the defendants in a case brought by Dhiraj Chhaparwal. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. Chhaparwal had filed a complaint against West Virginia College of Medicine and Health Sciences Center and other parties, which the district court dismissed by granting the defendants' motion for summary judgment. The appellate court denied Chhaparwal's motion for transcripts at government expense.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    12 views3 pages

    Chhaparwal v. West Virginia College of Medicine, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment in favor of the defendants in a case brought by Dhiraj Chhaparwal. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. Chhaparwal had filed a complaint against West Virginia College of Medicine and Health Sciences Center and other parties, which the district court dismissed by granting the defendants' motion for summary judgment. The appellate court denied Chhaparwal's motion for transcripts at government expense.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-2165

    DHIRAJ CHHAPARWAL,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    WEST VIRGINIA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH SCIENCES
    CENTER; UNIVERSITY HEALTH ASSOCIATES; NORMAN FERRARI, III,
    M.D.; MARTIN WEISSE, M.D.; MATHEW BRUNNER, M.D.; NANCY
    BRUNNER, M.D.; KATHLEEN PERKINS, M.D.; JENNIFER PUMPHREY,
    M.D.; JEAN SOMESHWAR, M.D.; MELISSA LARZO, M.D.; MEGAN
    TROISCHT, M.D.; HEATHER HIXENBAUGH, M.D.; MICHAEL WOLFE;
    JOHN/JANE DOES I-X,
    Defendants Appellees,
    and
    WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS,
    MCCLYMONDS, President and CEO,

    INCORPORATED;

    BRUCE

    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg.
    Frederick P. Stamp,
    Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:07-cv-00089-FPS-JSK)

    Submitted:

    May 18, 2010

    Decided:

    Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    June 9, 2010

    Dhiraj Chhaparwal, Appellant Pro Se. Christi R.B. Stover,


    STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP, Morgantown, West Virginia; Richard
    Michael Yurko, Jr., STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP, Clarksburg, West
    Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Dhiraj Chhaparwal appeals the district courts order
    granting

    summary

    judgment

    Chhaparwals complaint.
    reversible error.

    in

    favor

    of

    the

    Appellees

    on

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    Chhaparwal v. WV College of Medicine,

    No. 1:07-cv-00089-FPS-JSK (N.D. W. Va. Sept. 9, 2009).

    We also

    deny Chhaparwals motion for transcripts at government expense.


    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like