Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 18 views

    Jerome Anderson v. A. Pruitt, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Jerome Anderson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two defendants which was denied by the district court. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. As a result, the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling denying relief for Anderson's § 1983 complaint. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Jerome Anderson v. A. Pruitt, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    18 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Jerome Anderson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two defendants which was denied by the district court. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. As a result, the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling denying relief for Anderson's § 1983 complaint. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-11-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-7256

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Jerome Anderson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two defendants which was denied by the district court. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. As a result, the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling denying relief for Anderson's § 1983 complaint. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    18 views2 pages

    Jerome Anderson v. A. Pruitt, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Jerome Anderson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two defendants which was denied by the district court. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. As a result, the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling denying relief for Anderson's § 1983 complaint. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-7256

    JEROME ANDERSON,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    A. K. PRUITT, Captain; SUSAN HORAN,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.
    N. Carlton Tilley,
    Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-00553-NCT-PTS)

    Submitted:

    November 15, 2011

    Decided:

    November 18, 2011

    Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jerome Anderson, Appellant Pro


    WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE &
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Se. Robert T. Numbers, II,


    RICE, PLLC, Raleigh, North

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Jerome

    Anderson

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying


    relief

    on

    his

    42

    U.S.C.

    1983

    (2006)

    complaint.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.


    we

    affirm

    Anderson

    for
    v.

    the

    Pruitt,

    Sept. 12, 2011).


    facts

    and

    materials

    reasons

    legal
    before

    No.

    stated

    by

    the

    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    district

    1:10-cv-00553-NCT-PTS

    court.

    (M.D.N.C.

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like