Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 15 views

    Davis v. George Mason University, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Darryl G. Davis's case against George Mason University. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. It therefore affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in that court's October 21, 2005 ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Davis v. George Mason University, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    15 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Darryl G. Davis's case against George Mason University. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. It therefore affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in that court's October 21, 2005 ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-08-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-2340

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Darryl G. Davis's case against George Mason University. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. It therefore affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in that court's October 21, 2005 ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    15 views2 pages

    Davis v. George Mason University, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Darryl G. Davis's case against George Mason University. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. It therefore affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in that court's October 21, 2005 ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-2340

    DARRYL G. DAVIS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
    Judge. (CA-05-504-1)

    Submitted:

    June 30, 2006

    Decided:

    August 3, 2006

    Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    William E. Hutchings, Jr., SAUNDERS & SCHMIELER, P.C., Silver


    Spring, Maryland, for Appellant. David Drummey, Assistant Attorney
    General, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Darryl

    G.

    Davis

    appeals

    the

    district

    granting the defendants motion to dismiss.


    record and find no reversible error.

    courts

    order

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    Davis v. George Mason

    Univ., No. CA-05-504-1 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 21, 2005 & entered
    Oct. 25, 2005).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like