Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
3d 460
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Henderson v. Freeman, No. CA-94-294-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Jan. 25, 1995). We
deny Appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED