Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Valentine v. Corcoran, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Timothy Valentine's appeal of the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court that Valentine was not entitled to habeas corpus relief.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-02-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-7642

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Timothy Valentine's appeal of the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court that Valentine was not entitled to habeas corpus relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Valentine v. Corcoran, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Timothy Valentine's appeal of the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court that Valentine was not entitled to habeas corpus relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-7642

    TIMOTHY MAURICE VALENTINE,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL
    OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA96-760-CCB)
    Submitted:

    February 13, 1997

    Decided:

    February 27, 1997

    Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Timothy Maurice Valentine, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran,
    Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
    GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (1994), amended
    by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.
    No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the
    district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on
    the reasoning of the district court. Valentine v. Corcoran, No. CA96-760-CCB (D. Md. Sept. 4, 1996). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like