Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Eaddy v. Downey, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Lawrence Eaddy filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Officer Downey and Nurse Eveline Faulk which was denied by the district court. Eaddy appealed the district court's denial. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny relief on Eaddy's § 1983 complaint for the reasons stated by the district court. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-06-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-6157

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Lawrence Eaddy filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Officer Downey and Nurse Eveline Faulk which was denied by the district court. Eaddy appealed the district court's denial. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny relief on Eaddy's § 1983 complaint for the reasons stated by the district court. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Eaddy v. Downey, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Lawrence Eaddy filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Officer Downey and Nurse Eveline Faulk which was denied by the district court. Eaddy appealed the district court's denial. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny relief on Eaddy's § 1983 complaint for the reasons stated by the district court. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-6157

    LAWRENCE EADDY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    OFFICER DOWNEY; EVELINE FAULK, RN,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-03-797)

    Submitted:

    June 15, 2005

    Decided:

    June 28, 2005

    Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Lawrence Eaddy, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, NORTH


    CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Lawrence Eaddy appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.


    No. CA-03-797 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 21, 2004).

    We have reviewed

    See Eaddy v. Downey,

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like