Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Barry v. Gonzales, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Madiou Barry's petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) denial of his motion to reconsider. The Court reviewed the administrative record and concluded that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Barry's motion. The Court denied the petition for the same reasons stated by the BIA, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-07-13 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-1757

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Madiou Barry's petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) denial of his motion to reconsider. The Court reviewed the administrative record and concluded that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Barry's motion. The Court denied the petition for the same reasons stated by the BIA, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Barry v. Gonzales, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Madiou Barry's petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) denial of his motion to reconsider. The Court reviewed the administrative record and concluded that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Barry's motion. The Court denied the petition for the same reasons stated by the BIA, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-1757

    MADIOU BARRY,
    Petitioner,
    versus
    ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
    Respondent.

    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration


    Appeals. (No. A96-085-139)

    Submitted:

    June 20, 2007

    Decided:

    July 13, 2007

    Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Kell Enow, LAW OFFICES OF ENOW AND PATCHA, Silver Spring, Maryland,
    for Petitioner.
    Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General,
    James A. Hunolt, Senior Litigation Counsel, Kristin K. Edison,
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
    Respondent.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Madiou Barry, a native and citizen of Guinea, seeks
    review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board)
    denying

    his

    motion

    to

    reconsider.

    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    administrative record and conclude that the Board did not abuse its
    discretion in denying Barrys motion.

    See 8 C.F.R. 1003.2(a),

    (b) (2006).
    Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the
    reasons stated by the Board.

    See In re: Barry, No. A96-085-139

    (B.I.A. June. 6, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    - 2 -

    You might also like