Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Queen, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    1) Samuel Queen filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 challenging his conviction and sentence. 2) The district court denied Queen's petition. 3) On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before it.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-11-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-6710

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Samuel Queen filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 challenging his conviction and sentence. 2) The district court denied Queen's petition. 3) On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before it.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Queen, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Samuel Queen filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 challenging his conviction and sentence. 2) The district court denied Queen's petition. 3) On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before it.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-6710

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    SAMUEL ROBERT QUEEN, JR., a/k/a Fat Sammy,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:93cr-00369-AMD-1)

    Submitted:

    November 20, 2008

    Decided:

    November 26, 2008

    Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Samuel Robert Queen, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


    Barbara Suzanne
    Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Samuel Robert Queen, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals
    the

    district

    courts

    order

    2241 (2000) petition.


    reversible error.
    oral

    argument

    adequately

    denying

    relief

    on

    presented

    in

    28

    U.S.C.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm.

    because

    his

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    We dispense with

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like