Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    Schneider v. Brand, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    David Schneider filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 appealing the denial of relief by the district court. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny Schneider's petition based on the reasoning provided by the lower court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Schneider v. Brand, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    David Schneider filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 appealing the denial of relief by the district court. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny Schneider's petition based on the reasoning provided by the lower court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-09-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6620

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    David Schneider filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 appealing the denial of relief by the district court. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny Schneider's petition based on the reasoning provided by the lower court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Schneider v. Brand, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    David Schneider filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 appealing the denial of relief by the district court. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny Schneider's petition based on the reasoning provided by the lower court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6620

    DAVID P. SCHNEIDER,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    J. BRAND; K. HAWK, Dr.; T. WEST; H. LAPPIN,
    Warden,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
    Judge. (CA-96-775-5-H)
    Submitted:

    September 11, 1997

    Decided:

    September 22, 1997

    Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    David P. Schneider, Appellant Pro Se.
    Robert Edward Skiver,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
    his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of
    the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Schneider v. Brand,
    No. CA-96-775-5-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 1997). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like