Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Sa'id v. City of Alexandria, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Mustafa H. Sa'id filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the City of Alexandria and various police officers and officials. The district court denied relief on Sa'id's complaint. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision based on its reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-09-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-1813

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Mustafa H. Sa'id filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the City of Alexandria and various police officers and officials. The district court denied relief on Sa'id's complaint. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision based on its reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Sa'id v. City of Alexandria, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Mustafa H. Sa'id filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the City of Alexandria and various police officers and officials. The district court denied relief on Sa'id's complaint. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision based on its reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-1813

    MUSTAFA H. SAID,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CITY OF ALEXANDRIA; KERRY J. DONLEY; ROSE
    WILLIAMS BOYDE; REDELLA S. PERPER; WILLIAM C.
    CLEVELAND; WILLIAM D. EUILLE; LONNIE C. RICH;
    DAVID SPEEK; LOIS LAWSON; THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA POLICE DEPARTMENT; CHARLES E. SAMARA,
    Police Chief, individually; POLICE OFFICER
    PORTEL; POLICE OFFICER CONNIFF; JOHN DOE, #1,
    Police Officer; MARY DOE, Police Officer; JOHN
    DOE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CA-99-563-A)

    Submitted:

    August 31, 1999

    Decided:

    September 21, 1999

    Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Mustafa H. Said, Appellant Pro Se.
    George Arthur McAndrews,
    OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Mustafa H. Said appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the districts opinion and find no
    reversible error.
    district court.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the


    See Said v. City of Alexandria, No. CA-99-563-A

    (E.D. Va. June 11, 1999).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like