Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    Richardson v. Cross, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Sylvester Richardson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison wardens which was denied by the district court. Richardson appealed the denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Richardson v. Cross, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Sylvester Richardson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison wardens which was denied by the district court. Richardson appealed the denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-06-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-6256

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Sylvester Richardson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison wardens which was denied by the district court. Richardson appealed the denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Richardson v. Cross, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Sylvester Richardson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison wardens which was denied by the district court. Richardson appealed the denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-6256

    SYLVESTER A. RICHARDSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    WARDEN CROSS; GEORGE M. HINKLE, Warden; DAVID
    ROBINSON, Warden,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, Chief
    District Judge. (3:06-cv-00170-JRS)

    Submitted: June 15, 2007

    Decided:

    June 21, 2007

    Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Sylvester A. Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Sylvester A. Richardson appeals the district courts
    order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Richardson v. Cross, No. 3:06-cv-00170-JRS (E.D. Va. Feb.

    8, 2007).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like