Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    United States v. Hodges, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ernest Frederick Hodges Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion for discovery in his previously closed criminal case. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The unpublished opinion stated that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the court materials and that oral arguments would not aid in the decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's denial of Hodges' post-conviction discovery motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Hodges, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Ernest Frederick Hodges Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion for discovery in his previously closed criminal case. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The unpublished opinion stated that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the court materials and that oral arguments would not aid in the decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's denial of Hodges' post-conviction discovery motion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-09-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-6809

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ernest Frederick Hodges Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion for discovery in his previously closed criminal case. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The unpublished opinion stated that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the court materials and that oral arguments would not aid in the decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's denial of Hodges' post-conviction discovery motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Hodges, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ernest Frederick Hodges Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion for discovery in his previously closed criminal case. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The unpublished opinion stated that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the court materials and that oral arguments would not aid in the decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's denial of Hodges' post-conviction discovery motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-6809

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    ERNEST FREDERICK HODGES, JR.,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Samuel G. Wilson, District
    Judge. (7:05-cr-00040-sgw-1)

    Submitted:

    August 22, 2008

    Decided:

    September 24, 2008

    Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ernest Frederick Hodges, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


    Ronald Andrew
    Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ernest

    Frederick

    Hodges,

    Jr.,

    seeks

    to

    appeal

    the

    district court order denying his motion for discovery in his


    previously closed criminal case.
    find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court.

    United States v. Hodges, No. 7:05-

    cr-00040-sgw-1 (W.D. Va. Nov. 30, 2007).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like