Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Harold Wooten, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Harold Dwight Wooten's motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Wooten relied on Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 750 in filing his motion, but the district court denied relief because the Amendment did not change Wooten's Guidelines range. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no error in the district court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-09-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-6980

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Harold Dwight Wooten's motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Wooten relied on Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 750 in filing his motion, but the district court denied relief because the Amendment did not change Wooten's Guidelines range. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no error in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    14 views2 pages

    United States v. Harold Wooten, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Harold Dwight Wooten's motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Wooten relied on Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 750 in filing his motion, but the district court denied relief because the Amendment did not change Wooten's Guidelines range. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no error in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-6980

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    HAROLD DWIGHT WOOTEN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
    District Judge. (1:98-cr-00094-JAB-1)

    Submitted:

    September 24, 2013

    Before NIEMEYER and


    Senior Circuit Judge.

    THACKER,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    September 27, 2013

    Judges,

    and

    HAMILTON,

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Harold Dwight Wooten, Appellant


    Hamilton, Assistant United States
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Pro Se.
    Attorney,

    Robert Michael
    Greensboro, North

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Harold
    order
    U.S.C.

    denying

    Dwight

    his

    Wooten

    motion

    3582(c)(2)

    for

    appeals
    a

    (2006).

    the

    sentence
    Wooten

    district

    reduction

    relied

    Guidelines Amendment 750 for his motion.

    on

    courts
    under

    18

    Sentencing

    The district court

    denied relief because the Amendment did not result in a change


    to Wootens Guidelines range.
    find no error.

    We have reviewed the record and

    Accordingly, we affirm.

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the material before this court and argument will
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like