Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Harney v. Conroy, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    Daniel Scott Harney filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The United States District Court for the District of Maryland denied relief. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal. The appeals court agreed with the district court's reasoning for denying relief as presented in its July 18, 2001 opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-01-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7263

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Daniel Scott Harney filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The United States District Court for the District of Maryland denied relief. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal. The appeals court agreed with the district court's reasoning for denying relief as presented in its July 18, 2001 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    Harney v. Conroy, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Daniel Scott Harney filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The United States District Court for the District of Maryland denied relief. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal. The appeals court agreed with the district court's reasoning for denying relief as presented in its July 18, 2001 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7263

    DANIEL SCOTT HARNEY,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    PATRICK CONROY, Warden; J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR.,
    The Attorney General of the State of Maryland,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-001008-MJG)

    Submitted:

    December 26, 2001

    Decided:

    January 15, 2002

    Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Daniel Scott Harney, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
    Attorney General, Mary Ann Rapp Ince, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Daniel Scott Harney seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West
    1994 & Supp. 2001).

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny


    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Harney v. Conroy, No. CA-00-1008-MJG
    (D. Md. filed July 18, 2001 & entered July 20, 2001).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like