Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    United States v. Wilkes, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Shone Edward Wilkes appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's denial for the reasons stated in its opinion, and denied Wilkes' motion for appointment of counsel. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Wilkes, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Shone Edward Wilkes appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's denial for the reasons stated in its opinion, and denied Wilkes' motion for appointment of counsel. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-11-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7699

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Shone Edward Wilkes appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's denial for the reasons stated in its opinion, and denied Wilkes' motion for appointment of counsel. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Wilkes, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Shone Edward Wilkes appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's denial for the reasons stated in its opinion, and denied Wilkes' motion for appointment of counsel. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7699

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    SHONE EDWARD WILKES,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
    Frank D. Whitney,
    District Judge. (3:01-cr-00031-FDW-8)

    Submitted:

    November 13, 2008

    Decided:

    November 21, 2008

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Shone Edward Wilkes, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert,


    United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, Amy Elizabeth
    Ray,
    Assistant
    United
    States
    Attorney,
    Asheville,
    North
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Shone Edward Wilkes appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence under 18
    U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006).
    find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and


    Accordingly, we deny Wilkes motion

    for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court.

    United States v. Wilkes, No. 3:01-cr-00031-

    FDW-8 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 2008).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like