Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    Farley v. Rose, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of David P. Farley's suit under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2). The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Farley v. Rose, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of David P. Farley's suit under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2). The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-01-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-2066

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of David P. Farley's suit under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2). The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Farley v. Rose, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of David P. Farley's suit under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2). The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-2066

    DAVID P. FARLEY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    GLENN ROSE; WAYNE JARNISON; BETTY KIEFIN; JIM
    JOHNSON,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-552-5-BR)

    Submitted:

    January 16, 2001

    Decided:

    January 26, 2001

    Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    David P. Farley, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    David P. Farley appeals the district courts order dismissing
    his suit under 28 U.S.C.A. 1915(e)(2) (West Supp. 2000).

    We have

    reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no
    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

    district court.

    See Farley v. Rose, No. CA-00-552-5-BR (E.D.N.C.

    Aug. 7, 2000).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like