Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Smith v. MD State Police, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Daryl Smith on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Maryland State Police and several officials. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-03-13 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-2397

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Daryl Smith on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Maryland State Police and several officials. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Smith v. MD State Police, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Daryl Smith on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Maryland State Police and several officials. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-2397

    DARYL SMITH,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MARYLAND STATE POLICE; DAVID B. MITCHELL,
    Secretary of the Department of State Police;
    E. J. KRICKLER; HECTOR VENTO,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    William M. Nickerson, Senior District
    Judge. (CA-02-1716-WMN)

    Submitted:

    March 6, 2003

    Decided:

    March 13, 2003

    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Daryl Smith, Appellant Pro Se.


    Hugh Scott Curtis, Assistant
    Attorney General, Pikesville, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Daryl Smith appeals the district courts orders denying relief
    on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.

    We have reviewed the

    record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the


    reasons state by the district court.

    See Smith v. Maryland State

    Police, No. CA-02-1716-WMN (D. Md. Oct. 8 and Dec. 10, 2002).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like