Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Washington v. Elliott, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal filed by David J. Washington of a district court's denial of relief on his civil rights complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-07-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-1440

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal filed by David J. Washington of a district court's denial of relief on his civil rights complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Washington v. Elliott, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal filed by David J. Washington of a district court's denial of relief on his civil rights complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-1440

    DAVID J. WASHINGTON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    PAMELA T. ELLIOTT, State Farm; LEVON GRAVES;
    MAGISTRATE COX; THOMAS A. RUSSO; DIANE SCOTT;
    JAMES SALEEBY; SHERRY RHODES; J. J. ROBERTS,
    Trooper; MICHAEL G. NETTLES,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
    (4:07-cv-00619-RBH)

    Submitted: July 24, 2007

    Decided:

    July 27, 2007

    Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    David J. Washington, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    David J. Washington appeals the district courts order
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Washington v.

    Elliott, No. 4:07-cv-00619-RBH (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2007). We dispense


    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like