Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    United States v. Morgan, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jeffrey Lynn Morgan's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Morgan, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jeffrey Lynn Morgan's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-11-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7697

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jeffrey Lynn Morgan's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Morgan, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jeffrey Lynn Morgan's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7697

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    JEFFREY LYNN MORGAN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (2:01-cr-00001-BO-1)

    Submitted:

    November 17, 2009

    Decided:

    November 25, 2009

    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jeffrey Lynn Morgan, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Evenson, Rudolf A.


    Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Jeffrey Lynn Morgan appeals the district courts order
    denying

    his

    motion

    for

    reduction

    U.S.C. 3582(c) (2000).


    no reversible error.

    of

    sentence

    pursuant

    to

    18

    We have reviewed the record and find

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons


    United States v. Morgan, No.

    stated by the district court.

    2:01-cr-00001-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. filed Aug. 26, 2009 & entered Aug.


    27, 2009).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like