Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Trader, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Ned Trader's petition for habeas corpus relief filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The district court had dismissed the petition as an unauthorized second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2244(a), 2255. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the petition.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-09-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-6921

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Ned Trader's petition for habeas corpus relief filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The district court had dismissed the petition as an unauthorized second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2244(a), 2255. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. Trader, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Ned Trader's petition for habeas corpus relief filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The district court had dismissed the petition as an unauthorized second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2244(a), 2255. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-6921

    NED TRADER,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Senior District
    Judge. (CA-98-3353-B)

    Submitted:

    August 31, 1999

    Decided:

    September 9, 1999

    Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Ned Trader, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Manuelian, OFFICE OF THE
    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Ned Trader appeals the district courts order dismissing
    without prejudice his petition for habeas corpus relief filed under
    28 U.S.C. 2241 (1994) as an unauthorized second or successive
    motion under 28 U.S.C.A. 2244(a), 2255 (West Supp. 1999).

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    no reversible error.
    the district court.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of


    See United States v. Trader, No. CA-98-3353-B

    (D. Md. Nov. 4, 1998).

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like