Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Raley v. Prince George Co PD, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Wayne Raley in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Prince George County Police Department and an officer. The appeals court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error, affirming the lower court's ruling based on its reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-03-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-2333

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Wayne Raley in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Prince George County Police Department and an officer. The appeals court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error, affirming the lower court's ruling based on its reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Raley v. Prince George Co PD, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Wayne Raley in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Prince George County Police Department and an officer. The appeals court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error, affirming the lower court's ruling based on its reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-2333

    WAYNE P. RALEY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    THE PRINCE GEORGE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT;
    DAVID PETERSON,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-01-377-3)

    Submitted:

    March 14, 2002

    Decided:

    March 21, 2002

    Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Wayne Raley, Appellant Pro Se. Hunter Martin Robertson, Prince
    George, Virginia; Christopher Lawrence Perkins, LECLAIR RYAN, P.C.,
    Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Wayne Raley appeals the district courts order denying relief
    on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.

    We have

    reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no
    reversible error.
    district court.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the


    See Raley v. Prince George County Police Dept,

    No. CA-01-377-3 (E.D. Va. Nov. 5, 2001).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like