Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    Harrison v. Bingo Old Solomon Kitchen, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Eugene Paul Harrison appealed a district court ruling granting summary judgment to defendants in a civil action. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no errors. They affirmed the district court's decision to grant summary judgment for the defendants based on the reasons stated by the district court. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Harrison v. Bingo Old Solomon Kitchen, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Eugene Paul Harrison appealed a district court ruling granting summary judgment to defendants in a civil action. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no errors. They affirmed the district court's decision to grant summary judgment for the defendants based on the reasons stated by the district court. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-10-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-1717

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Eugene Paul Harrison appealed a district court ruling granting summary judgment to defendants in a civil action. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no errors. They affirmed the district court's decision to grant summary judgment for the defendants based on the reasons stated by the district court. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Harrison v. Bingo Old Solomon Kitchen, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Eugene Paul Harrison appealed a district court ruling granting summary judgment to defendants in a civil action. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no errors. They affirmed the district court's decision to grant summary judgment for the defendants based on the reasons stated by the district court. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-1717

    EUGENE PAUL HARRISON, a/k/a


    Eugene Paul Harrison, Sr.,

    Eugene

    P.

    Harrison,

    a/k/a

    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    BINGO OLD SOLOMON KITCHEN; JAMES FELDER, Owner; ROCHELLE
    HEYWARD, Manager,
    Defendants Appellees,
    and
    JESSE FOSTER,
    Defendant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia.
    Patrick Michael Duffy, District
    Judge. (3:08-cv-02651-PMD)

    Submitted:

    October 15, 2009

    Decided:

    October 19, 2009

    Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Eugene Paul Harrison, Appellant Pro Se.


    Heyward, Appellees Pro Se.

    James Felder; Rochelle

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Eugene

    Paul

    Harrison

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and


    granting summary judgment to the Defendants in his civil action.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    See Harrison v. Bingo Old Solomon Kitchen, No. 3:08-cv-

    02651-PMD

    (D.S.C.

    June

    19,

    2009).

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like