Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    Crosby v. Baird, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Jeffrey Roy Crosby appealed the district court's denial of relief on his complaint against various government officials and attorneys. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and found that the district court's opinion provided adequate reasoning for its decision to deny Crosby relief. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision without requiring oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Crosby v. Baird, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Jeffrey Roy Crosby appealed the district court's denial of relief on his complaint against various government officials and attorneys. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and found that the district court's opinion provided adequate reasoning for its decision to deny Crosby relief. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision without requiring oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-11-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-6857

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Jeffrey Roy Crosby appealed the district court's denial of relief on his complaint against various government officials and attorneys. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and found that the district court's opinion provided adequate reasoning for its decision to deny Crosby relief. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision without requiring oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Crosby v. Baird, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Jeffrey Roy Crosby appealed the district court's denial of relief on his complaint against various government officials and attorneys. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and found that the district court's opinion provided adequate reasoning for its decision to deny Crosby relief. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision without requiring oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-6857

    JEFFREY ROY CROSBY,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    ROBBIE BAIRD, United States Probation Officer;
    WILLIAM DAY, Assistant United States Attorney;
    KEVIN HARVEY, Special Agent; EDWARD SAVERANCE,
    Senior United States Marshall; JOHN LAMBERT,
    Administrator of Florence County Detention
    Center; DAVID KNIGHT, South Carolina Law Enforcement Division; DEBRA O. JACKSON, Attorney
    at Law; DIXIE WELCH; WENDY COX; MICHAEL RAY;
    VINCE FLAMINI,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence.
    Cameron McGowan Currie, District
    Judge. (CA-98-2284)

    Submitted:

    November 4, 1999

    Decided:

    November 9, 1999

    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jeffrey Roy Crosby, Appellant Pro Se.


    Barbara Murcier Bowens,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina;
    Clifford Leon Welsh, North Myrtle Beach, South Carolina; Susan
    Taylor Wall, NEXSEN, PRUET, JACOBS, POLLARD & ROBINSON, Charleston,
    South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Jeffrey Roy Crosby appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his complaint filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331, 42
    U.S.C. 1983, 1985, 1986.

    We have reviewed the record and the

    district courts opinion and find no reversible error.

    According-

    ly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Crosby

    v. Baird, No. CA-98-2284 (D.S.C. June 16, 1999).

    We dispense with

    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like