Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Alston v. Virginia Judiciary, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Charles Alston filed a civil complaint against the Virginia Judiciary System in district court. The district court denied relief on Alston's complaint. Alston appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also stated that unpublished opinions like this one are not binding precedent and that it was dispensing with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-02-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-2487

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Charles Alston filed a civil complaint against the Virginia Judiciary System in district court. The district court denied relief on Alston's complaint. Alston appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also stated that unpublished opinions like this one are not binding precedent and that it was dispensing with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Alston v. Virginia Judiciary, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Charles Alston filed a civil complaint against the Virginia Judiciary System in district court. The district court denied relief on Alston's complaint. Alston appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also stated that unpublished opinions like this one are not binding precedent and that it was dispensing with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-2487

    CHARLES ALSTON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    VIRGINIA JUDICIARY SYSTEM,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
    Judge. (CA-03-410-A)

    Submitted: February 19, 2004

    Decided:

    February 24, 2004

    Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Charles Alston, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Charles Alston appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his civil complaint.
    find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court.

    See Alston v. Virginia Judiciary

    Sys., No. CA-03-410-A (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 16, 2003 & entered
    Oct. 20, 2003).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like