Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Valentine v. Burgess, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Randy L. Valentine under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Detective J.T. Burgess. The district court denied Valentine relief and Valentine appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-04-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-6025

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Randy L. Valentine under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Detective J.T. Burgess. The district court denied Valentine relief and Valentine appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Valentine v. Burgess, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Randy L. Valentine under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Detective J.T. Burgess. The district court denied Valentine relief and Valentine appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-6025

    RANDY L. VALENTINE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    J. T. BURGESS, Detective,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence.
    Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
    Judge. (CR-05-1157)

    Submitted: March 30, 2006

    Decided: April 10, 2006

    Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Randy L. Valentine, Appellant Pro Se.


    W. Howard Boyd, Jr.,
    Jennifer D. Eubanks, GALLIVAN, WHITE & BOYD, P.A., Greenville,
    South Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Randy L. Valentine appeals the district courts order
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.

    We have reviewed

    the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on


    the reasoning of the district court. See Valentine v. Burgess, No.
    CR-05-1157 (D.S.C. Dec. 20, 2005).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like