Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Smith v. Hollingsworth, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Benjamin Smith's appeal of a district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny Smith's petition for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-08-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-8039

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Benjamin Smith's appeal of a district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny Smith's petition for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Smith v. Hollingsworth, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Benjamin Smith's appeal of a district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny Smith's petition for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-8039

    BENJAMIN SMITH,
    Petitioner -

    Appellant,

    v.
    LISA J. HOLLINGSWORTH; J. D. WHITEHEAD,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
    (1:08-cv-03166-RDB)

    Submitted:

    July 22, 2010

    Decided:

    August 18, 2010

    Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Benjamin Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Gordon, Assistant United


    States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Benjamin

    Smith,

    federal

    prisoner,

    appeals

    the

    district courts order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. 2241


    (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition.
    and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record

    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.

    Smith v. Hollingsworth,

    No. 1:08-cv-03166-RDB (D. Md. Sept. 17, 2009).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like