Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    Kelvin Christian v. Luther Wright, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Kelvin Christian appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Dr. Luther Wright for failure to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. While allowing Christian to proceed in forma pauperis, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of the complaint for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Kelvin Christian v. Luther Wright, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Kelvin Christian appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Dr. Luther Wright for failure to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. While allowing Christian to proceed in forma pauperis, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of the complaint for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-04-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-7602

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Kelvin Christian appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Dr. Luther Wright for failure to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. While allowing Christian to proceed in forma pauperis, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of the complaint for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Kelvin Christian v. Luther Wright, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Kelvin Christian appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Dr. Luther Wright for failure to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. While allowing Christian to proceed in forma pauperis, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of the complaint for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-7602

    KELVIN CHRISTIAN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    LUTHER WRIGHT, M.D.,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Liam OGrady, District
    Judge. (1:11-cv-01163-LO-JFA)

    Submitted:

    March 29, 2012

    Decided:

    April 3, 2012

    Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Kelvin Christian, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Kelvin

    Christian

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to


    state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1) (2006).
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    Accordingly,

    although

    pauperis,

    affirm

    court.

    we

    we
    for

    and
    grant

    the

    find

    no

    reversible

    leave

    to

    proceed

    reasons

    stated

    by

    error.

    in

    the

    We

    forma

    district

    Christian v. Wright, No. 1:11-cv-01163-LO-JFA (E.D. Va.

    Nov. 9, 2011).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like