Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Vincent Eugene Williams v. John P. Metzger, Iii, Chairman Virginia Parole Board, 77 F.3d 472, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The document is an appellate court decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms a lower court's denial of relief to an appellant who filed a Section 1983 complaint against the chairman of the Virginia Parole Board. The appellate court found no reversible error in the lower court's reasoning. The facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, so oral arguments were not necessary. The court affirmed the lower court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-02-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 77 F.3d 472 Docket: 95-7660

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an appellate court decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms a lower court's denial of relief to an appellant who filed a Section 1983 complaint against the chairman of the Virginia Parole Board. The appellate court found no reversible error in the lower court's reasoning. The facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, so oral arguments were not necessary. The court affirmed the lower court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Vincent Eugene Williams v. John P. Metzger, Iii, Chairman Virginia Parole Board, 77 F.3d 472, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an appellate court decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms a lower court's denial of relief to an appellant who filed a Section 1983 complaint against the chairman of the Virginia Parole Board. The appellate court found no reversible error in the lower court's reasoning. The facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, so oral arguments were not necessary. The court affirmed the lower court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    77 F.

    3d 472

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Vincent Eugene WILLIAMS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
    v.
    John P. METZGER, III, Chairman; Virginia Parole Board,
    Defendants--Appellees.
    No. 95-7660.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Feb. 7, 1996.
    Decided Feb. 26, 1996.

    Vincent Eugene Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea,


    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,
    Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42
    U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint.* We have reviewed the record and the
    magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
    on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Williams v. Metzger, No. CA-95-410
    (E.D.Va. Sept. 14, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    The parties consented to disposition by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28


    U.S.C. 636(c) (1988)

    You might also like