Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Massey v. Smith, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Richard L. Massey, Jr. v. William L. Smith et al. affirming the district court's denial of relief on Massey's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in its January 23, 1996 opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-08-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6283

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Richard L. Massey, Jr. v. William L. Smith et al. affirming the district court's denial of relief on Massey's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in its January 23, 1996 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Massey v. Smith, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Richard L. Massey, Jr. v. William L. Smith et al. affirming the district court's denial of relief on Massey's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in its January 23, 1996 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6283

    RICHARD L. MASSEY, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    WILLIAM L. SMITH; RONALD HUTCHINSON; RICHARD
    SINGLETARY; CONWAY BAILEY; CAPTAIN JOHNSON;
    CAPTAIN RUELIN; GLORIA RICHMOND; GOLSON;
    CHESTER, Correctional Officer II; COLLICK,
    Correctional Officer II; PAUL REYNOLDS;
    DOROTHEA DAVIS, Correctional Officer II;
    SEWALL SMITH; LIEUTENANT PRICE; WEST, JR.,
    Correctional Officer II; RICHARD LANHAM, Commissioner; KEVIN FORTSON, Sergeant; OFFICER
    OLIVER,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-951099-L)
    Submitted:

    July 25, 1996

    Decided:

    August 7, 1996

    Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Richard L. Massey, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,


    Attorney General, Audrey J. S. Carrion, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
    GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Massey v. Smith, No. CA-95-1099-L (D. Md. Jan. 23, 1996). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like