Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Scott v. Rainey, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Barrett K. Scott in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several defendants. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in that court's opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-08-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6498

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Barrett K. Scott in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several defendants. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in that court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Scott v. Rainey, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Barrett K. Scott in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several defendants. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in that court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6498

    BARRETT K. SCOTT,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    PATRICIA RAINEY; CHARLIE J. CEPAK; JAMES L.
    HARVEY; PARKER EVATT, in their individual and
    official capacity,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.
    (CA-95-3103-4-19BE)
    Submitted:

    July 24, 1997

    Decided:

    August 7, 1997

    Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Barrett K. Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Vinton DeVane Lide, Michael
    Stephen Pauley, LIDE, MONTGOMERY, POTTS & MEDLOCK, P.C., Columbia,
    South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
    his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's
    recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
    on the reasoning of the district court. Scott v. Rainey, No. CA-953103-4-19BE (D.S.C. Mar. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like