Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Ripley, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of Wilbert Ripley's motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-01-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7731

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of Wilbert Ripley's motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. Ripley, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of Wilbert Ripley's motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7731

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    WILBERT L. RIPLEY,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Robert E. Payne, Senior
    District Judge. (3:99-cr-00147-REP-1)

    Submitted:

    January 13, 2009

    Before WILLIAMS,
    Judges.

    Chief

    Judge,

    Decided:

    and

    TRAXLER

    January 20, 2009

    and

    KING,

    Circuit

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Wilbert L. Ripley, Appellant Pro Se.


    Sara Elizabeth Chase,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Wilbert L. Ripley appeals the district courts order
    denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
    3582(c)(2) (2006).
    reversible error.
    by

    the

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    district

    court.

    See

    United

    States

    v.

    Ripley,

    No. 3:99-cr-00147-REP-1 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 11, 2008; entered


    Aug. 14, 2008).
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like