Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Asemani v. Fisher, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Billy G. Asemani's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Asemani complained that Defendants would not authorize funds to pay for an expert witness that Asemani deemed essential to his state post-conviction case. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-05-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6097

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Billy G. Asemani's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Asemani complained that Defendants would not authorize funds to pay for an expert witness that Asemani deemed essential to his state post-conviction case. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Asemani v. Fisher, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Billy G. Asemani's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Asemani complained that Defendants would not authorize funds to pay for an expert witness that Asemani deemed essential to his state post-conviction case. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6097

    BILLY G. ASEMANI,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    LOIS I. FISHER, Chief Attorney; NANCY S. FORSTER, Chief
    Public Defender; COLLATERAL REVIEW DIVISION OF THE OPD,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
    (1:08-cv-03272-RDB)

    Submitted:

    May 21, 2009

    Decided:

    May 29, 2009

    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Billy G. Asemani, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Billy G. Asemani appeals the district courts order
    dismissing a 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) action complaining that
    Defendants will not authorize funds to pay for an expert witness
    that Asemani deems essential to his state post-conviction case.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Asemani v. Fisher, No. 1:08-cv-03272-RDB (D. Md. filed

    Dec. 15, 2008, entered Dec. 16, 2008).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like