Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Curtis, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order that reduced Michael Curtis's sentence to 325 months of imprisonment. Curtis had filed a motion under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) for a sentence reduction. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-08-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-8415

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order that reduced Michael Curtis's sentence to 325 months of imprisonment. Curtis had filed a motion under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) for a sentence reduction. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    12 views2 pages

    United States v. Curtis, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order that reduced Michael Curtis's sentence to 325 months of imprisonment. Curtis had filed a motion under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) for a sentence reduction. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-8415

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    MICHAEL CURTIS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
    District of West Virginia, at Charleston.
    Joseph R. Goodwin,
    Chief District Judge. (2:89-cr-00054-1)

    Submitted:

    July 30, 2009

    Decided:

    August 3, 2009

    Before MOTZ, KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael Curtis, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant


    United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael

    Curtis

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    granting his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2)


    (2006), and reducing his sentence to 325 months of imprisonment.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    United States v. Curtis, No. 2:89-cr-00054-1 (S.D.W. Va.

    Oct. 20, 2008).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like