Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Sykes v. Dep. Moore, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    Devon Sykes appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in Sykes v. Moore, No. 2:10-cv-00305-JBF-TEM (E.D. Va. July 13, 2010). The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-11-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-7021

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Devon Sykes appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in Sykes v. Moore, No. 2:10-cv-00305-JBF-TEM (E.D. Va. July 13, 2010). The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    Sykes v. Dep. Moore, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Devon Sykes appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in Sykes v. Moore, No. 2:10-cv-00305-JBF-TEM (E.D. Va. July 13, 2010). The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-7021

    DEVON SYKES,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    DEP. MOORE, Mail lady,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
    Judge. (2:10-cv-00305-JBF-TEM)

    Submitted:

    October 5, 2010

    Decided:

    November 9, 2010

    Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Devon Sykes, Appellant Pro se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Devon

    Sykes

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.


    1915A(b) (2006).
    reversible error.
    by

    the

    JBF-TEM

    district
    (E.D.

    We have reviewed the record and find no


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    court.

    Va.

    July

    Sykes
    13,

    v.

    2010).

    Moore,
    We

    No.

    2:10-cv-00305-

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like