Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • McBride v. Dotson, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to John David McBride on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. The court also denied McBride's motions for reconsideration, agreeing with the reasons stated by the district court in its previous orders. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-02-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-7685

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to John David McBride on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. The court also denied McBride's motions for reconsideration, agreeing with the reasons stated by the district court in its previous orders. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    McBride v. Dotson, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to John David McBride on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. The court also denied McBride's motions for reconsideration, agreeing with the reasons stated by the district court in its previous orders. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-7685

    JOHN DAVID MCBRIDE,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    STEVEN DOTSON, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, District
    Judge. (CA-03-71)

    Submitted: February 12, 2004

    Decided:

    February 20, 2004

    Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    John David McBride, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    John David McBride appeals the district courts orders
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint, and denying his
    motions for reconsideration.

    We have reviewed the record and find

    no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated


    by the district court.

    See McBride v. Dotson, No. CA-03-71 (E.D.

    Va. Aug. 25, 2003; Sept. 26, 2003; Oct. 9, 2003).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like