Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Sekoh v. Werner, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Danny J. Sekoh appealed a district court's decision granting summary judgment to defendants Craig Werner and United Parcel Service in Sekoh's civil action. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its July 19, 2006 order granting summary judgment to the defendants. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-04-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-1952

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Danny J. Sekoh appealed a district court's decision granting summary judgment to defendants Craig Werner and United Parcel Service in Sekoh's civil action. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its July 19, 2006 order granting summary judgment to the defendants. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Sekoh v. Werner, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Danny J. Sekoh appealed a district court's decision granting summary judgment to defendants Craig Werner and United Parcel Service in Sekoh's civil action. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its July 19, 2006 order granting summary judgment to the defendants. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-1952

    DANNY J. SEKOH,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CRAIG WERNER, Division Manager; UNITED PARCEL
    SERVICE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (5:04-cv-00893-BO)

    Submitted:

    March 21, 2007

    Decided:

    April 12, 2007

    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Danny J. Sekoh, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Ballantine Molony, ALSTON


    & BIRD, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Danny

    J.

    Sekoh

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing his


    civil action.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district

    court.

    See

    Sekoh

    (E.D.N.C. July 19, 2006).

    v.

    Werner,

    No.

    5:04-cv-00893-BO

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like