Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    Bramwell v. Iglecia, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Terry L. Bramwell filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Dr. Raymond Iglecia and Sheriff Johnny Newhart which was denied by the district court. Bramwell appealed the district court's decision. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling denying relief on Bramwell's § 1983 complaint. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Bramwell v. Iglecia, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Terry L. Bramwell filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Dr. Raymond Iglecia and Sheriff Johnny Newhart which was denied by the district court. Bramwell appealed the district court's decision. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling denying relief on Bramwell's § 1983 complaint. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-09-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-6706

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Terry L. Bramwell filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Dr. Raymond Iglecia and Sheriff Johnny Newhart which was denied by the district court. Bramwell appealed the district court's decision. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling denying relief on Bramwell's § 1983 complaint. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Bramwell v. Iglecia, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Terry L. Bramwell filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Dr. Raymond Iglecia and Sheriff Johnny Newhart which was denied by the district court. Bramwell appealed the district court's decision. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling denying relief on Bramwell's § 1983 complaint. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-6706

    TERRY L. BRAMWELL,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    RAYMOND IGLECIA, Doctor,
    Defendant - Appellee,
    and
    JOHNNY NEWHART, Sheriff,
    Defendant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Henry E. Hudson, District
    Judge. (3:05-cv-00475)

    Submitted: August 30, 2007

    Decided:

    September 7, 2007

    Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Terry L. Bramwell, Appellant Pro Se.


    Andrew Joseph Terrell,
    WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Terry L. Bramwell appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bramwell v.


    Iglecia, No. 3:05-cv-00475 (E.D. Va. Mar. 22, 2007).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like